JPMorgan’s Role in Nigerian Oil Deal Has Come Back to Haunt It

Featured Story

It’s important to realize that there is a difference between self-interest and selfishness. All people have self-interests which can operate in ways that are not selfish. For example, it is in our self-interest to get a job and earn an income so that we can support our family. We can do that in ways that are not selfish. By contrast, other economic systems such as socialism ignore the biblical definitions of human nature. As a result, they allow economic power to be centralized and concentrate power in the hands of a few greedy people. Those who complain of the influence major corporations have on our lives should consider the socialist alternative where a few governmental bureaucrats control every aspect of our lives.


At the heart of a case against JPMorgan Chase is whether it did enough to safeguard Nigeria’s money.Credit Credit Mike Segar/Reuters

Under the rule of the Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha more than 20 years ago, a handful of high-ranking government officials looted billions of dollars from the country’s coffers.

Now the Nigerian government is demanding some of its money back — from JPMorgan Chase.

In a British court, lawyers for the country are suing a subsidiary of the largest United States bank, charging that it enabled corrupt former officials to extract nearly $900 million between 2011 and 2013 from a government bank account in London.

JPMorgan says it was following instructions it received from senior Nigerian government officials. The country’s attorney general himself wrote a letter attesting to the legitimacy of the instructions. But the bank has been unable to persuade a British judge to throw out the case, in part because of the unusual circumstances surrounding the money transfers — including the fact that two banks to which JPMorgan wired the money rejected the transfers because of concerns that they might violate money-laundering laws.

At the heart of the case is whether JPMorgan did enough to safeguard Nigeria’s money. Under British law, banks are required to act in their customers’ best interests, even if someone connected to a customer tries to get them to do otherwise. Even as it tried to send money to various recipients, JPMorgan reported to regulators its concerns that it might be transferring funds to a convicted money launderer. It made the transfers anyway.

It is the latest example of a major American bank getting caught up in a foreign corruption scandal. In Malaysia, Goldman Sachs and some former executives have been accused of participating in a multibillion-dollar fraud involving a government investment fund. Unlike those executives, however, no JPMorgan employees have been accused of wrongdoing.

In the London lawsuit, the Nigerian government is seeking damages from JPMorgan of nearly $900 million.This is your last free article.Subscribe to The Times

The bank’s decision to do business with Nigeria — a country that is ranked 144th out of 180 countries on Transparency International’s corruption list — involved a calculation of risk.

“A head of state known or alleged to be corrupt is the riskiest type of client, both because of potential civil and criminal liability and because of reputational damage should details of the relationship come out, as they often do when there is a change in power in the relevant country,” said Joshua Kirschenbaum, a former director at the Treasury Department’s anti-money-laundering agency, FinCEN.

A JPMorgan spokesman said it would fight Nigeria’s legal claim, which “is completely without merit.”

The bank has argued in court filings that its agreement with the Nigerian government specified, at the time it was signed, that JPMorgan would follow whatever instructions it received, even if it had reason to believe that the instructions were “not in the best interests” of the account holder.

It also claims that Nigeria has failed to identify specific things it could have done differently, since it reported each suspicious set of instructions to its British regulator.

Aside from the London lawsuit, JPMorgan has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with the Nigerian affair.

Court papers from the London lawsuit and a related criminal trial underway in Italy provide a detailed record of the alleged scheme. (JPMorgan is not a subject of the criminal trial.)

It began when Mr. Abacha, the president at the time, awarded a license to drill oil near the Niger River Delta to Dan Etete, Nigeria’s oil minister. Mr. Etete paid just $2 million for the license, which was expected to generate billions of dollars in revenue.

The Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha in 1998.CreditJames Fasuekoi/Associated Press

Mr. Abacha’s successors accused Mr. Etete of corruption and tried to revoke the license. They were unsuccessful. Mr. Etete has denied wrongdoing.Source

Fraud #Banks #Money #Corruption

Fraud #Banks #Money #Corruption #Bankers



StevieRay Hansen
Editor, Bankster Crime

MY MISSION IS NOT TO CONVINCE YOU, ONLY TO INFORM…



Don't Miss

“We Worry About Armed Conflict”: Investors Are Suddenly Freaking Out About Post-Election Violence

By StevieRay Hansen

Earlier we reported that amid fears of election night chaos, the White House has been put on lockdown, and that according to NBC sources, beginning…

Read More

DoubleLine: Digital Currencies Will End The Dollar’s Status As The World’s Reserve Currency

By StevieRay Hansen

We most recently described the Fed’s stealthy plan to deposit digital dollars to “each American” during the next crisis as an unprecedented monetary overhaul, but more…

Read More

Peter Schiff: The Fed Has Never Been Right

By StevieRay Hansen

Peter Schiff delivered a key-note speech at the Virtual Investor Day Conference. He walked through the history of the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy over the…

Read More

Flying Blind: Clueless About Risk, We’re Speeding Toward Systemic Failure

By StevieRay Hansen

For all these reasons, the risks of systemic collapse are much higher than commonly anticipated. There’s an irony in discussing risk: since we all have an instinctive…

Read More

Crime Pays: Goldman Strikes $2BN Deal With DoJ To Avoid All Charges Tied To 1MDB

By StevieRay Hansen

Goldman Sachs is reportedly on the cusp of settling one of the biggest criminal cases involving a Wall Street bank since the financial crisis: According…

Read More

Futures Jump Ahead Of Tuesday Stimulus Deadline

By StevieRay Hansen

Bulls will breathe a sigh of relief that on the 33-year-anniversary of Black Monday (when the Dow dropped 22.6% on this day in 1987) futures…

Read More

This Is Not Sustainable, Were Watching What the World Is Now Calling the Great Reset

By StevieRay Hansen

(Reality–New World Order Pukes ) Our President Knows the End Is Near With the Current Financial Apparatus… The U.S. government spent more than $3.13 trillion…

Read More

Banks Are In Trouble: Wells Tumbles As Revenues Plunge, NIM Hits Record Low, Warns On Payment Deferrals

By StevieRay Hansen

If there is one constant during earnings season, it is that no matter what the other banks do, Wells Fargo will always shit the bed,…

Read More

No Stimulus, No Problem: One Bank Sees “No Armageddon” Without A New Stimulus Deal

By StevieRay Hansen

In recent weeks, many have opined – this website included  – that with the US economy careening into a double dip recession (or perhaps depression), it is…

Read More

The Pandora’s Box Of Fed’s Digital Currency Will Ignite An “Inflationary Conflagration”

By StevieRay Hansen

We most recently described the Fed’s stealthy plan to deposit digital dollars to “each American” during the next crisis as a unprecedented monetary overhaul, but…

Read More

StevieRay Hansen

1 Comment

  1. […] JPMorgan’s Role in Nigerian Oil Deal Has Come Back to Haunt It […]

Leave a Comment