These Are The Banks Where The Fed’s $1.4 Trillion In Reserves Are Parked, Big Trouble-Birth Pains

Featured Story

Over the past few days there has been much confusion over the repocalpyse that shook the overnight funding market, and just as much confusion over the definition of reserves which some banks were unwilling to part with, other banks were desperate for, and in the end both Powell and the former head of the NY Fed’s markets desk admitted that Quantitative Tightening had been taken too far, and the total amount of reserves in the system was too low and would have been increased.

And while the book is yet to be written on the causes for last week’s shocking move higher in repo rates, which sent general collateral as high as 10%, a record print in a time of $1.4 trillion in excess reserves, we can shed some clarity on the definition of “reserves.” While there is a universe of semantic gymnastics when it comes to explaining what reserves are, the most basic definition is quite simply “cash”, however not cash in circulation but rather cash (and deposits) held in the bank’s account with the Federal Reserve (which is where its name comes from).

This means that there should be a de facto identity between the total amount of cash in the US banking system and the amount of total (minimum required plus excess) reserves. And sure enough, if only looks at the Fed’s weekly H.8 statement, which lists the “Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States“, if one adds across the various banking cash aggregates in the US, what one gets is precisely the total amount of reserves.

This is seen in the chart below, which adds across the weekly cash for both small and large domestic commercial banks operating in the US (blue and red shaded areas) as well as foreign commercial banks (yellow shaded) operating in the US. The black line, meanwhile, shows the total amount of reserve balances with Federal Reserve Banks. By definition, these two numbers have to be virtually identical, and sure enough, they are.

Why is the above information important?

Because as the FT reported on Friday as part of its interview with the NY Fed’s hapless and confused career-economist president, John Williams (who back in May inexplicably fired the man most intimately familiar with the plumbing of the US financial system, the NY Fed’s market desk head Simon Potter), the NY Fed president said that it was “looking at why cash failed to move from banks’ accounts at the Fed into the repo market, where banks and investors borrow money in exchange for Treasuries to cover short-term funding needs.

Additionally, as Lorie Logan, senior vice-president in the markets group, told the FT, “Reserves are concentrated, the excess reserves relative to the minimum level each bank is demanding is concentrated. And the key question is how those reserves, as the level was coming down, would get redistributed, and how smooth that redistribution process would be.”

In short, the NY Fed is looking at the banks that comprise the three aggregate levels above, and is trying to figure out why they did not hand out their cash to other banks that were in desperate need for liquidity, and why said reserves were so “concentrated”, i.e., sticky, so as to precipitate a funding crisis which was only halted when the Fed stepped in.

Alas, John Williams did not elaborate, so we will do so for him: the Fed is not only trying to figure out why banks with excess cash/reserves parked at the Fed did not offer it to their more troubled peers but why they refused to do so even though any such loan would be perfectly collateralized by money-good securities such as Treasuries, MBS and Agency debt.

One possible explanation: the banks that should have lent out cash did not do so because they were afraid that i) the borrower would not be able to return the cash on the next day and ii) any potential failure in the banking system would lead to a collapse of the repo system, potentially making their ultra-safe collateral impaired, if not worthless. Hence, their desire to hold on to cash… and dear life.

In any event, if Williams really wants to find out why banks failed to step in and prevent last week’s apocalypse, he should start with the banks that are laid out in the chart above- and maybe he should focus first and foremost on the foreign banks that currently have $521 billion in cash parked at the Fed, on which they – the foreign banks – are collecting 1.80% in annual interest.

And once the NY Fed is done with this exercise, it may want to quickly found out the flip side of the equation: which banks were so desperate for liquidity last week they not only risked being seen using the Fed’s overnight repo operation, which in this day and age of $1.4 trillion in excess reserves carries the same stigma as using the Discount Window in the days before the Lehman failure, but did so by oversubscribing the Fed’s $75 billion repo facility for 3 days straight. In short, one or more banks are in dire need of just over $75 billion in liquidity, and the Fed better figure out who they are… before some financial reporter does, reveals their name and start what may soon be the biggest bank run since the financial crisis. Source

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, Bankster Crime

MY MISSION IS NOT TO CONVINCE YOU, ONLY TO INFORM…

#Fraud #Banks #Money #Corruption #Bankers,#Powerful Politicians, #Businessmen


Don't Miss

“Watershed” Moment: Is Gold Signaling Stocks Now On “Shaky Footing”?

By StevieRay Hansen

I rarely discuss financial markets these days. Although I pay attention, it’s not in the obsessive manner I did a decade ago. I mainly keep my…

Read More

COVID-Crunch? Fed Begins Rationing Coins As Americans Horde Cash

By StevieRay Hansen

Having closed the US Mint and halted production (blaming COVID-19)  after a surge in demand for gold and silver coins, and warned of the danger of using bills (once…

Read More

This Can Not Continue, “A Staggering Number”: Over $18 Trillion In Global Stimulus In 2020, 21% Of World GDP

By StevieRay Hansen

On Friday, we relayed the latest observations from BofA chief investment officer, Michael Hartnett who concluded that there is just one bull market to short – namely…

Read More

HSBC Resuscitates 35,000 Job Cut Plan As Banking Troubles Persist

By StevieRay Hansen

Back in February, HSBC, Europe’s largest bank and troubled lender, announced a plan that would slash upwards of 35,000 jobs. Shortly after, the lender put restructuring plans on hold for…

Read More

Soaring Food & Energy Costs Spark Rebound In Producer Prices

By StevieRay Hansen

Producer Prices rebounded MoM in May with headline Final Demand PPI rising 0.4% (against +0.1% exp) but it left PPI YoY still down 0.8%… Source: Bloomberg…

Read More

Civil War 2.0 Weather Report: The Tsunami Begins, But You Knew That…

By StevieRay Hansen

If we can stop him, we shall prevent the collapse of Western Civilization.  No pressure.” – Sherlock Holmes:  A Game of Shadows In the first issue of the…

Read More

Pandemic, Economic Collapse, Full Societal Breakdown

By StevieRay Hansen

“And the will of Zeus was moving towards its end.”  – Homer Symbiotic Disharmony The recline and flail of western civilization beats on.  Pandemic, economic…

Read More

JPMorgan Is “Counting The Days” Until The Second Covid Wave

By StevieRay Hansen

As governments ease lockdown restrictions, attention is focused on the risk of a second wave of COVID-19 infections. And, as JPMorgan writes, “the message from…

Read More

“It’s All Bullsh*t” – 3 Leaks That Sink The COVID Narrative

By StevieRay Hansen

In recent days a series of leaks across the globe have further shown the “official line” on coronavirus does not hold water… The science of…

Read More

Central Banks Are Destroying What Was Left Of Free Markets

By StevieRay Hansen

President Reagan memorably said that the nine words you don’t want to hear are “I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.” Governments in all…

Read More