These Are The Banks Where The Fed’s $1.4 Trillion In Reserves Are Parked, Big Trouble-Birth Pains

Featured Story

Over the past few days there has been much confusion over the repocalpyse that shook the overnight funding market, and just as much confusion over the definition of reserves which some banks were unwilling to part with, other banks were desperate for, and in the end both Powell and the former head of the NY Fed’s markets desk admitted that Quantitative Tightening had been taken too far, and the total amount of reserves in the system was too low and would have been increased.

And while the book is yet to be written on the causes for last week’s shocking move higher in repo rates, which sent general collateral as high as 10%, a record print in a time of $1.4 trillion in excess reserves, we can shed some clarity on the definition of “reserves.” While there is a universe of semantic gymnastics when it comes to explaining what reserves are, the most basic definition is quite simply “cash”, however not cash in circulation but rather cash (and deposits) held in the bank’s account with the Federal Reserve (which is where its name comes from).

This means that there should be a de facto identity between the total amount of cash in the US banking system and the amount of total (minimum required plus excess) reserves. And sure enough, if only looks at the Fed’s weekly H.8 statement, which lists the “Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States“, if one adds across the various banking cash aggregates in the US, what one gets is precisely the total amount of reserves.

This is seen in the chart below, which adds across the weekly cash for both small and large domestic commercial banks operating in the US (blue and red shaded areas) as well as foreign commercial banks (yellow shaded) operating in the US. The black line, meanwhile, shows the total amount of reserve balances with Federal Reserve Banks. By definition, these two numbers have to be virtually identical, and sure enough, they are.

Why is the above information important?

Because as the FT reported on Friday as part of its interview with the NY Fed’s hapless and confused career-economist president, John Williams (who back in May inexplicably fired the man most intimately familiar with the plumbing of the US financial system, the NY Fed’s market desk head Simon Potter), the NY Fed president said that it was “looking at why cash failed to move from banks’ accounts at the Fed into the repo market, where banks and investors borrow money in exchange for Treasuries to cover short-term funding needs.

Additionally, as Lorie Logan, senior vice-president in the markets group, told the FT, “Reserves are concentrated, the excess reserves relative to the minimum level each bank is demanding is concentrated. And the key question is how those reserves, as the level was coming down, would get redistributed, and how smooth that redistribution process would be.”

In short, the NY Fed is looking at the banks that comprise the three aggregate levels above, and is trying to figure out why they did not hand out their cash to other banks that were in desperate need for liquidity, and why said reserves were so “concentrated”, i.e., sticky, so as to precipitate a funding crisis which was only halted when the Fed stepped in.

Alas, John Williams did not elaborate, so we will do so for him: the Fed is not only trying to figure out why banks with excess cash/reserves parked at the Fed did not offer it to their more troubled peers but why they refused to do so even though any such loan would be perfectly collateralized by money-good securities such as Treasuries, MBS and Agency debt.

One possible explanation: the banks that should have lent out cash did not do so because they were afraid that i) the borrower would not be able to return the cash on the next day and ii) any potential failure in the banking system would lead to a collapse of the repo system, potentially making their ultra-safe collateral impaired, if not worthless. Hence, their desire to hold on to cash… and dear life.

In any event, if Williams really wants to find out why banks failed to step in and prevent last week’s apocalypse, he should start with the banks that are laid out in the chart above- and maybe he should focus first and foremost on the foreign banks that currently have $521 billion in cash parked at the Fed, on which they – the foreign banks – are collecting 1.80% in annual interest.

And once the NY Fed is done with this exercise, it may want to quickly found out the flip side of the equation: which banks were so desperate for liquidity last week they not only risked being seen using the Fed’s overnight repo operation, which in this day and age of $1.4 trillion in excess reserves carries the same stigma as using the Discount Window in the days before the Lehman failure, but did so by oversubscribing the Fed’s $75 billion repo facility for 3 days straight. In short, one or more banks are in dire need of just over $75 billion in liquidity, and the Fed better figure out who they are… before some financial reporter does, reveals their name and start what may soon be the biggest bank run since the financial crisis. Source

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, Bankster Crime

MY MISSION IS NOT TO CONVINCE YOU, ONLY TO INFORM…

#Fraud #Banks #Money #Corruption #Bankers,#Powerful Politicians, #Businessmen


Don't Miss

Equity Focus: Investors Taking a Second Look at BancorpSouth Bank (NYSE:BXS) After Recent Market Moves,Money Flow Indicator Has Ducked Below The Zero Line

By StevieRay Hansen

Wealth-creating capitalism requires more than just competition and trading. Beneficial capitalism is founded on the “rule of law and virtues like cooperation, stable families, self-sacrifice,…

Read More

Chevron New (CVX) Shareholder Fort Point Capital Partners Cut Its Stake

By StevieRay Hansen

JUST BECAUSE WE CAN’T SPECIFY THE EXACT REASON FOR PAIN, THAT DOESN’T MEAN THERE ISN’T ONE. Bank are bad for society as a whole, Christians…

Read More

MetLife Investment Advisors LLC lessened its position in shares of Bancorpsouth Bank (NYSE:BXS) by 19.9% in the 4th quarter

By StevieRay Hansen

Why doesn’t God cause Christians to win the lottery so the money can be given to good causes? God doesn’t need the lottery to fund…

Read More

Technical Investor Update for Bancorpsouth Inc (BXS)

By StevieRay Hansen

I have a confession to make. Every once in a while, when the lottery jackpot is worth at least a few hundred million dollars, I…

Read More

Criminals got good service at Nordic banks

By StevieRay Hansen

Being “good” can get you far in our world. Good behavior wins praise, commuted jail terms, and tangible rewards. Good deeds net accolades and often…

Read More

He is a no stranger to the readers of business and corporate crime.

By StevieRay Hansen

God did not overlook the corruption in Noah’s day: “Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every…

Read More

BancorpSouth Bank:Transgender robber convicted of stealing to fund sex change operations

By StevieRay Hansen

The Golden Rule is doing to others what you would want them to do to you. If you were living a life controlled by a…

Read More

Ichimoku Signal Alert For BancorpSouth Bank (NYSE:BXS) as Cloud Conversion Line Reading Touches (9, 26, 52, 26)}}

By StevieRay Hansen

Today, the list of capital sins is as follows: pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, anger, and sloth. Capital sins derive their name from the Latin caput,…

Read More

Bancorpsouth Bank (NYSE:BXS) Stock Rating Lowered by Stephens

By StevieRay Hansen

The Bible offers quite a few examples of growing wealth through legitimate means. Some are similar to investing—spending money now to make money later. God’s…

Read More

Wells Fargo CEO Tim Sloan steps down as bank struggles to get past scandals

By StevieRay Hansen

The word mammon comes from the Greek word mammonas. Similar root words exist in Hebrew, Latin, Aramaic, Chaldean and Syriac. They all translate to “money, wealth, and material…

Read More